<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>EAG(Cendari) - customising EAG for research purposes</title>
		<description>Discuss EAG(Cendari) - customising EAG for research purposes</description>
		<link>http://www.apex-project.eu/index.php/en/articles/172-eag-cendari-customising-eag-for-research-purposes</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 01:56:36 +0200</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.apex-project.eu/index.php/en/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Karsten Kühnel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.apex-project.eu/index.php/en/articles/172-eag-cendari-customising-eag-for-research-purposes#comment-182</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I welcome very much your attempt to perform a general principle of customisation regarding the use of standard profiles and possible extensions! Another point: What do you think about more depth in the information about the history of the repository. I would suggest to insert a subfield for "mandates" above . I think that one of the most important information about a repository would be - from the view on EAG as a standard for archival description - information about the repository's mandates for collecting and composing collections and fonds. From this kind of information a researcher may deduce which kind of material and contents he would find in a collection holding institution. For instance: Who knows the mandates for collecting given to the International Tracing Service's archives, can deduce, which kind of provenances he would be able to find there.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Karsten Kühnel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 12:08:13 +0200</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.apex-project.eu/index.php/en/articles/172-eag-cendari-customising-eag-for-research-purposes#comment-182</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
